Scopic adds performance comment to multi-asset reports

10 September 2024

Scopic Research has added a performance / opinion piece to its multi asset DNA reports to help advisers and paraplanners when monitoring multi-asset funds.

The opinion section leverages from Scopic’s understanding of individual multi-asset funds embedded biases and the market conditions under which it expects each fund to perform well or to struggle.
It covers the multi-asset fund’s performance over the year leading up to the annual review date or since the previous Scopic review meeting with the portfolio team. 
It breaks down the year under review into separate risk-on and risk-off periods.
It discusses how the multi-asset fund performed during each of these periods and suggests whether the strength or weakness in returns during each could have been anticipated given the portfolio team’s approach, the instruments it uses, and the team’s preferences. For example, has the multi-asset fund’s performance been along the lines of what we could have expected?
There are 127 multi-asset funds from 18 fund groups currently covered by the service.

The following fund suites have been covered so far:

BNY Mellon Multi Asset Funds

Cornelian Risk Managed Funds

Downing Fox Funds

Hawksmoor

HSBC Global Strategy Portfolios

Legal & General Multi Index

Legal & General Multi Index Income

Rathbone Multi Asset Portfolios

Rathbone Greenbanj Multi Asset Portfolios

Scopic says all funds within the Scopic Multi Asset DNA Reports service will eventually have the Opinion section included.  

This will happen as their respective annual review meetings have been completed.

Paul Ilott, managing director of Scopic, said: Together with the existing investment journey section in our Multi Asset DNA Reports the new Opinion / performance review section will help to deepen advisers’ and paraplanners’ understanding of how an individual multi-asset fund is expected to perform, and whether these expectations have broadly been met.

“Additionally, it will help advisers to understand, explain and tolerate, tepid periods of performance  when our research indicates that this was probably what we should have been expected given the portfolio team’s approach. Equally, it will help advisers to be more critical when it’s warranted.”

“Advisers/paraplanners now have this additional analysis at their disposal to use in conversations with their own clients if they so wish.  This is especially important given the requirement placed upon advisers to ensure that their clients know what they have invested in and how it’s likely to behave – think Consumer Duty.”

Professional Paraplanner