Drawdown clients are being exposed to high-risk investments without their knowledge, warns EV, leaving advice firms on a “ticking time bomb” of potential complaints.
According to the financial technology provider, just a quarter of multi-asset funds have a low to medium income risk rating, forcing investors into funds which don’t match their risk tolerance.
EV rated 170,000 funds for income risk and found 76% of the funds used for drawdown clients are at the higher end of the risk spectrum. More than half of these funds have “retirement” in their name.
This comes despite over 85% of retirees showing a low to medium appetite for risk to their income.
Bruce Moss, founder of EV, said: “These findings are extremely concerning, providing strong evidence that significant numbers of clients using drawdown have been put into investment solutions which don’t match their risk tolerance. Given the criticality of retirees’ income plans to their future wellbeing and that an investment loss for most would be very difficult to recover from, this points to a potentially enormous problem for advice firms. Clients are unknowingly being exposed to more risk than they would feel comfortable with. Unless urgent action is taken, this will come back to bite advice firms.”
EV’s findings follow the FCA’s recent thematic review of retirement income advice, which highlighted serious deficiencies around aligning investment solutions to the client’s risk profile and tolerance level. The regulator’s review of advice models and advice files found that the risk profiling approach “showed no clear distinction between accumulation or decumulation.” It also found that only 30% of advice firms’ investment portfolios were constructed specifically to meet the needs of customers in decumulation.
Moss added: “In recent years, clients have been insulated from some investment risk, with exceptionally benign equity markets around the world at, or close to, all-time highs. A potentially sharp reversal, which could come at any time, could create serious loss of income for many retirees and cause considerable hardship. This would inevitably lead to client complaints and, without evidence of robust risk suitability processes for income, any claims would be difficult to dispute. Many retirees and their advisers are sitting on a ticking time bomb and action must be taken to avoid causing foreseeable harm.”
