ESG is no longer optional in Private Markets

1 April 2026

Simone Borsetti, Research Associate, MainStreet Partners says that ESG integration in private markets is no longer a differentiator; it is a baseline expectation.

Private markets are no longer a peripheral allocation within portfolios. They have become a structural component of long-term capital deployment, and sustainability considerations are increasingly shaping how that capital is allocated and assessed.

In fact, according to our latest ESG and Sustainability Barometer, private markets are projected to reach USD 26.6 trillion in assets under management by 2030.

At the same time, 94% of investment managers report that they have already invested in, or intend to allocate to, private market strategies.

Pension funds in particular continue to expand exposure to private equity and infrastructure in pursuit of long-duration returns and portfolio diversification, which brings with it greater scrutiny.

From overlay to underwriting

Where ESG was previously applied primarily as a screening tool, it now shapes the investment thesis itself.

Environmental and social dynamics are analysed through the lens of demand resilience, regulatory trajectory, capital expenditure requirements and long-term asset durability.

Energy transition exposure is assessed through policy direction, regulatory frameworks, and infrastructure bottlenecks.

Climate considerations now incorporate both transition risk – driven by policy, technology and market shifts – and physical risk, which directly affects long-term asset resilience and valuation assumptions.

Biodiversity and water stress are also being evaluated for their potential operational and supply chain implications, particularly in sectors exposed to natural capital.

These considerations are no longer peripheral. They are part of core risk underwriting and value creation analysis.

As allocations increase, expectations around accountability have strengthened.

Limited Partners now examine how ESG considerations are integrated across the full investment lifecycle, from due diligence and ownership to monitoring and exit strategy.

A sustainability policy alone is no longer sufficient. Investors increasingly focus on governance structures, internal incentives, data discipline and reporting consistency.

Private assets continue to face structural data limitations compared with listed markets. Disclosure is less standardised and transparency varies across strategies.

However, regulatory convergence across Europe and the UK is gradually narrowing this gap.

Frameworks such as the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the EU Taxonomy and the UK Sustainability Disclosure Requirements are reinforcing expectations that sustainability claims must be supported by measurable evidence.

The emphasis is shifting from narrative to implementation.

Capital allocation is adjusting

These dynamics are already visible at market level.

Green infrastructure, renewable platforms, grid modernisation and energy efficiency strategies continue to attract sustained private capital.

Global energy investment now exceeds USD 3 trillion annually, with a growing share directed towards clean technologies, electrification and storage.

Climate adaptation and resource resilience are also gaining traction, particularly within infrastructure and real assets, where physical risk directly affects long-term cash flow assumptions.

Private markets tend to favour tangible assets with predictable demand profiles.

Sustainability themes that align with these characteristics – such as renewable energy systems, electrification infrastructure and resource efficiency – are attracting increasing capital allocation.

A competitive reset

Perhaps the most significant consequence is competitive.

As ESG integration becomes embedded, it is reshaping how managers are evaluated.

Limited Partners increasingly assess the quality of governance, the depth of ESG integration and the credibility of measurable outcomes when making allocation decisions.

ESG integration in private markets is no longer a differentiator; it is a baseline expectation.

What influences capital allocation today is the consistency between stated objectives, governance structures and measurable outcomes over the holding period.

Between two managers operating in the same sector, such as in renewable infrastructure, investors are more likely to favour the one that can evidence structured ESG integration, governance discipline and credible sustainability reporting.

Private markets are not only expanding in scale. They are undergoing a qualitative shift.

ESG and Sustainability are now embedded in how risk is priced, how capital is allocated and how managers compete for institutional mandates.

Private markets are not only expanding at scale, but also undergoing a qualitative shift. The evolution is less about branding and increasingly about discipline.

Main image: ESG, green, water, droplet, sustain, daniel-norin-6zKEK46iVIc-unsplash

Professional Paraplanner