Transfers from pensions with both DB and DC elements
4 September 2017
Steve Bailey of ATEB Consulting offers some pointers for paraplanners advising on schemes with both DB and DC sections
Some DB schemes may have a defined contribution (DC) section running alongside the DB arrangement. In such cases, it is important to ascertain whether the DC arrangement is established as a separate registered pension scheme to the DB arrangement or if they are both within the same registered pension scheme.
This is important for several reasons:
Under the legislation, the PCLS must be paid from the same scheme under which the member becomes entitled to their pension income. If the DC is in the same scheme as the DB rights, it will mean that, rather than commuting the scheme pension to provide PCLS, it would be technically possible to pay the PCLS from the DC section. This will, of course, be subject to the rules of the occupational pension scheme. It is important to ascertain the options that are available to scheme members in order to provide suitable advice.
Under Inland Revenue Pre-A-Day rules, it was not possible for an individual to build up a tax-free cash (TFC) entitlement under a DB scheme (where the TFC was a multiple of pension, i.e. 3n/80ths or n/60ths) greater than 25% of the pension entitlement as at A-Day. Therefore, scheme specific protected cash is not going to apply to the DB scheme. However, where the Pre-A-Day DC arrangement was in the same exempt approved occupational pension scheme, and the scheme rules allowed for any TFC to be paid from the DC arrangement, it is possible for an individual to have built up a Pre-A-Day TFC entitlement of more than 25% of the pension rights. Therefore, it is important to understand how the DC is set up and the options open to members under the scheme’s rules.
Remember, if an individual has scheme specific protected cash it will be lost on a transfer, unless that transfer complies with HMRC block transfer rules as set out in the Pensions Tax Manual, page PTM063150.
However, if a transfer is successfully made under the block transfer rules, it is important to understand that, when benefits are taken, to benefit from PCLS greater than 25%, all the member’s benefits under the registered pension scheme must be crystallised at the same time. That rules out phasing of benefits, so if that is critical for the client, the scheme specific protected cash is irrelevant.
It is important to ask the scheme administrator if it is possible to transfer one element of the scheme and not the other.
Assuming there is not a requirement to transfer both together, the suitability report must make clear that each element has been considered separately.
It is not appropriate to switch the DC element by default just because the main DB arrangement was transferred.
The original article was commissioned by ATEB Consulting from Paul Clark, a pension technical specialist with RUSSELLDENE Consulting
ATEB Consulting’s Steve Bailey examines why and how Paraplanners should consider a workplace pension in a pension transfer recommendation. Firms involved with...
Fund data and technology company FE fundinfo has acquired cashflow planning provider CashCalc, adding the cashflow planning capability to its suite...
The majority of paraplanners (58%) find suitability report writing software a useful tool but only if used in tandem...